United breaks a sweat over breaking guitars

If you’re a big fan of PR debacles, then you’ve probably already heard about the United Breaks Guitars music video on Youtube.

If you haven’t, here’s a summary: Guy watches guitar get broken by baggage handlers. Guy gets nowhere with customer service. Guy makes suspiciously-high-production-value music video on Youtube complaining about his treatment.

And the crowd goes wild. It’s at nearly 400,000 views already.

I have to wonder if Dave Carroll, the man behind the video, was just that pissed, or if he’s some kind of marketing genius. Or maybe a little of both.

United has since responded in an attempt to suppress the raging wildfire. I don’t know exactly what they did and I don’t care. It’s too late now.

I used to think I was alone in this harsh insensitivity towards corporate responses like this. After all, they’re doing something, right? A quick glance at the Youtube comments, or at many of the blog posts on this ordeal, shows me I’m actually among the least angry now.

Too little, too late. Is this the new face of social media? Should big companies start investing more in prevention, and less in cure?

Then again, for the viral video, perhaps it’s appropriate that there is no cure.

Posted in Ethics, Public Relations, Social Media | Leave a comment

Shills down my spine: 3 ways to kick off the fight against online marketing evil-doers

There seems to be an accepted reality in online marketing: Writing fake, positive reviews for products is something everyone does. It’s the only way to be competitive.

Does this smell like bullshit to anyone else?

I’ve looked around the net for statistics on just how many online, on-site (i.e. sites like Amazon or Newegg) reviews are real, written by users who had no conflicts of interest. I can’t find anything. Are 10% of reviews planted by scoundrel “marketing” firms? 25%? 50%? Even more?

shill

How could we even find out? Where do we start in this epic fight against evil? I have some ideas.

Language

You can guess, with 83% accuracy, whether the writer of a given text is male or female. Surely we can use a method like this to detect when people are raving a bit too much about a product, or recalling way too many details about their recent dining experience.

Men and women are mostly the same. Online shills are the lowest form of human life. They should stick out like a sore thumb.

Location

We can tell where reviews are coming from. If we have particularly prolific IP addresses pumping out reviews, can’t we weed them out? Joe P. Normal isn’t going to write 200 reviews a week for a select few products across multiple websites.

I’m sure that some of the major sites are doing this already, but once again I can’t find much information on it. This is something that should be publicized more. (And, please, if you have information you’d like to volunteer, comment!)

Fighting online shills is a noble cause. If you’re doing it, let the world know!

Shame

It’s no longer enough to simply delete shill reviews. We have to do something to discourage the practice in general.

My first suggestion is simple:

endureWe can’t really bring the stocks back (right?), but the concept of public humiliation as punishment is still very real, especially in the realm of public relations and online marketing.

And there’s another problem here: These shills, as I’ve already noted, are some of the most despicable people alive. They’re shameless, leaving us with just one target: Their clients.

Even the most unscrupulous PR people around know that it usually pays to tell the truth. Why? Because if you lie and it gets out, it’s that much more damaging (and thus, expensive). We need to make it so there’s a high cost associated with shilling.

Let’s fight back

In a world that’s all a-twitter, the problem of shills is going to grow just as fast, or even faster, than the expanding sphere of social media. We need a system set in place to fight back and protect the integrity of online opinion.

What do you think?

Posted in Ethics, Public Relations, Social Media | Leave a comment

The impending backlash against personal branding

If you’re trying to get a room full of people all to roll their eyes simultaneously, try encouraging them to work on their personal branding.

Why? Because personal branding is getting obnoxious.

We’ve seen the Johnny Cashes dressing in all black. We’ve scratched our heads at the Gene Simmonses of the personal branding world. Now we’ve got Marilyn Mansons running around, and none of them can stop talking about the importance of personal branding.

Personal branding is, unfortunately, a real thing. It has impact. In an ideal world we wouldn’t boil people down to brands. But some people do, and so personal branding was born.

As the online space gets more crowded with these brands, however, certain people have had the inclination to go bigger. Do not go bigger. Increasingly, people will hate you for it.

Here are some tips in a world where people hate personal branding a little bit more.

If you brand through clothing, stick to one small thing.

matthew-lesko

In That Thing You Do, band manager Tom Hanks gives his drummer a pair of sunglasses. He explains that he’s going to be “Shades” now. In another example, as mentioned before, Johnny Cash frequently dressed in all black.

These both worked (granted, one was fiction) and were classy because they were simple. I have a friend who wears a baseball cap all the time. He isn’t trying to brand himself, but if you are, follow his lead and stick to one thing.

And don’t let the one thing be a suit covered in question marks.

Avoid buzzwords

This one is the most important for your online presence. Maybe you really believe you’re a social media marketing expert who specializes in corporate synergy. Your readers won’t. This will be the biggest part of the backlash.

Don’t be a jackass

If the concept of personal branding appeals to you, there’s already a significant chance that you’re arrogant, self-absorbed and generally a pain in the ass to others.

If you briefly paused just now to consider whether you actually are those things, then you’re alright. Don’t worry about it. If you let out a brief, sharp “Ha!” or otherwise immediately dismissed it, then I encourage you to take a long, hard look at yourself.

Because personal branding holds a higher appeal with annoying jackasses, we see more annoying jackasses doing the personal branding thing. When you enter that arena, remember who else is going to be there.

Don’t “personally brand”

This is the best advice. Don’t try to personally brand. Just let it happen. Be yourself. There’s nothing wrong with making sure Google turns up the right stuff. Just don’t be “that guy.”

Posted in Branding | 5 Comments

Hire a writer.

To me, the advice “hire a writer” is self-explanatory in its greater wisdom and purpose. It’s like “plant a tree.”

I don’t follow it, of course, because I already am a writer. I imagine I’m not the only one who feels this way.

We recently submitted our new website Presskit’n, where you can build social media newsrooms, to a neat little place called KillerStartups. Maybe you’ve heard of it.

KillerStartups has a somewhat daunting application process, although the results leave little to be desired. What surprised me most were the changes they made to my description of Presskit’n– changes for the better. It struck me: I’m a good writer, sure, but I’m also too familiar with my subject. It took a pair of outside eyes to make changes for the better. Or maybe the guy or girl over at KillerStartups (You can see Presskit’n here) is just that awesome at writing about new web apps.

So I’m right back to “Hire a writer.” Find one and hire one if you’ve got a piece of important writing that needs to be finished. You won’t be disappointed.

Oh, and while you’re at it: Plant a tree.

Posted in Writing | 1 Comment

Presence: the best place to start with your public relations

Here at IvyLees, we’re big on Do-It-Yourself public relations. We’re building apps that help everyone get into the game, on even footing.

Every now and then, someone tells us, “But you’re not helping with this!” (Or that. Sometime’s it’s that.)

Well, I assure you: We’re planning on it. Right down to the iHandshake, an app for the iphone that shakes hands for you. (If you steal this idea after reading this blog post, I’m coming after you!)

After that, we’re asked, “Why start with Presskit’n and online newsrooms”?

And the answer always boils down to one thing: Presence.

Presence is incredibly important online. You can be present in a lot of places, including Youtube, Facebook and other such sites. When it comes to standardizing your message and getting it out into the world, the first presence you should have is an online newsroom (Well, before that, a website, but we’re talking specifics here).

So, before you conduct a PR campaign, ask yourself: Am I present?

Posted in Branding, Public Relations, Social Media | Leave a comment

Interview with John, the mysterious creator of ‘E-mails from an Asshole’

I had a chance yesterday to conduct an e-mail interview with the comic genius behind E-mails from an Asshole. The e-mails he sent were from a familiar name: Mike Anderson, the same Mike who accused a stranger of running over his dog. Here it is.

Fedorable: First off, who are you?

John: We can go with John. I’m a student at Penn State.

Fedorable: How did you get started writing hilarious e-mails?

John: It all started maybe a year ago, when I was trying to buy a car. I was looking through ads, and saw this ridiculous post in the “for sale” section where a woman was asking for a Ford Explorer for $1500. She even put a picture of herself up. I thought she was an idiot, and couldn’t let it go without messing with her. I tried selling her a piece of shit car, and she got very upset. It really amused me, and I started doing it to a lot of people whenever I was bored at class or work. I’ve always loved screwing with people though. I remember once when I was nine years old, I got my family kicked off of AOL for pissing off old people in a chat room.

Fedorable: Any e-mails gone horribly wrong?

John: A lot of people don’t actually read what I sent them. Some will respond to the most ridiculous shit with “that sounds good!” I remember once I sent a guy a picture of a BMW that was completely totaled, and he asked me when he could come check it out. Some people are too dumb to even realize that I am fucking with them. One woman was looking for a hot tub repair, and I told her how I would rig the hot tub with a hose hooked up to her sink faucet so she could add hot water. She told me that sounded good.

Sometimes, the people I am e-mailing are amused and it just turns into a regular conversation. Other times they will just completely curse me out and it is too unoriginal to post on the website. A lot of the responses I get are simply “fuck off!”

Fedorable: What kind of success has the site seen so far?

John: I’ve been really surprised at how popular it became. It really happened overnight. The first day, the site had 65,000 hits. Now it has been about a week and I am up to 800,000 hits from all around the world. I saw it was mentioned on comedycentral.com, which was pretty cool. Other sites like Digg and Reddit gave me a lot of traffic, as well. It is crazy to see how my e-mails are being posted on hundreds of message boards. Also, I’m actually getting a decent amount of money from ads and donations…I wasn’t expecting that, but it is nice to get money for doing something I love.

Fedorable: What efforts did you put into promotion? Or was it 100% viral?

John: Well, I posted the e-mails on a message board and showed my friends for a while and people thought they were hilarious. A lot of people suggested that I make a website. I really wasn’t planning on doing anything with them, but when I saw that people would actually go to a website, I made one. I posted the website on a few message boards, and it just blew up from there. Next thing I knew, people were posting it on tons of popular sites. I really didn’t do anything else to promote it. I told a couple friends, but I really don’t even tell my friends for the sake of getting hits anymore.

Fedorable: Lots of content creators and Internet marketers struggle daily to get this kind of exposure. Any tips for them?

John: My only tip would be to have good, entertaining content. I mean, look at my website. It is coded like shit, I probably only put like two hours of effort into actually coding it. It can be the best looking website out there, but if the content isn’t something that keeps people interested, nobody will tell anyone about it.

Fedorable: You’ve been doing it for a year. Does that mean you have a backlog of posts ready to go up? Do you plan to update the site regularly with new e-mails?

John: I had a backlog, but I posted a lot of those when I launched the site. I started with about 35 e-mails on the site. I am saving a few in case I run out of material, but I am still doing new e-mails. I plan on updating the site a few times every week. I do have a lot of e-mails that I probably won’t post just because I don’t find them as funny as others.

Fedorable: I’m sure people are excited to hear you’ll regularly update the site. Do you think the site’s success will hurt your efforts at creating new content, because of people becoming increasingly wary of online ads, either from your own e-mails or those of copycats?

John: I think it may have a minor impact on my efforts, but there are so many people out there, that I don’t think it will be that much of a problem. I try to single out ads that look like stupid, gullible people wrote them. A lot of people don’t even reply to my e-mails already, and they are the smart ones. I guess I feel that there will always be stupid people out there and they will always fall for my shit.

Fedorable: How about user submissions?

John: I don’t think I am going to accept user submissions. I’m sure some are funny, but I don’t want to have to pick and choose. Plus I am very lazy, and do not feel like programming anything that would handle user submissions. Maybe if the site gets really big, I would implement something like that.

Fedorable: You created a website because there were rumblings for a website. I’ve seen a few posts asking about a book. Do you think the format would make for a good book, and is it something you’d like to do?

John: I would like to make a book. I think it could be a good coffee table book or something. I am going to wait a while before I look into doing that, however. Even if it doesn’t sell, it would be cool to say I have a book. I’d like to think my life would be like David Duchovny’s in Californication, with bitches all over me because I wrote a book.

Fedorable: Since this was over e-mail, I was a bit worried that you would just mess with me for the entire interview. Did the thought ever cross your mind?

John: It did, but this is my first interview and I didn’t want to come off as an asshole. If someone I don’t like interviews me, I will probably just mess with them.

Fedorable: How should fans go about getting updates?

John: A lot of people are asking for an RSS feed, so I’ll probably set that up this weekend if I have time. I guess fans can just check the main page of my site for updates; they happen at random throughout the week.

Thanks to John for taking time out of his Internet trolling to give us some insight.

Posted in Social Media, Technology | 3 Comments

Do you “get it”? Why you might be killing Twitter

Perhaps the only thing more annoying than the legions of “Social Media experts” on Twitter are the folks who claim they “get it.” Those quotation marks are theirs, not mine.

I’ve seen this time and time again. “It’s all about the conversation,” they’ll say, emphasizing a different syllable of the word conversation to cover up the fact that they’re not saying anything new.

Well, I have a message for these people: Get over yourselves.

And another one: You’re hurting Twitter’s chances at mainstream acceptance, and you’re chiseling away at the very foundation of social media.

I’ve had very few successful, real-life conversations (emphasis on third syllable) with a group of people where one smug jerk stood in the corner and acted like he was the only one who knew how people talked to each other. Well, let me fix that: I haven’t had any conversations like that, but I can’t imagine it’d go over well with anyone.

This isn’t a new phenomenon. Every online community in history has invariably faced some sort of elitism from older members. Calling someone a newbie is a standard Internet insult.

As a result, a lot of online communities have rules agains this type of behavior, because it can rot the community from the inside out. But Twitter isn’t rotting, right? It’s thriving! People are joining every day!

And then 55% of new users never come back. Maybe the problem isn’t the app, but the people who are on it.

Since we’re so completely obsessed with this new social media order, and the manners of behavior on it, let’s add a new unwritten rule: Don’t be an elitist jerk. I think Twitter would be better off for it.

Posted in Social Media | Leave a comment

It’s never a good time to rebrand

I’ll often mention to my freelance clients that it’s a good time for them to rebrand. Every time, without exception, they’ll reply with an array of excuses on why they can’t.

And they’re right. They’re always right. It’s never a good time to rebrand.

We just created a new brand, Presskit’n, from a few of our former IvyLees features. Since we encountered a whole bevy of issues, I thought I’d use our rebranding process as sort of a “how-to” and a “why now” on branding. If you find yourself in need of a rebrand, but making excuses, maybe you can look at what we did and forge ahead with the rebranding process. The timing will never seem right, but if you’re making one of the following missteps, your brand probably needs a kick in the butt.

PROBLEM: Missing the target market

I sat down with a friend of mine, Dr. Bob Davis (who unfortunately isn’t blogging for the world) and he flat out told me that my brand was missing my target market. IvyLees, he reasoned, was too masculine. I was a bit puzzled– can a website be masculine or feminine?

He then reminded me that most professionals in communications, our target market, were female. So if the site leaned either way, it should be towards a feminine style– or at least in his mind, away from the strong contrasts and stark look of IvyLees.

HOW WE FIXED IT: Making a new brand that doesn’t miss

Web apps are versatile. A bakery would have a lot of trouble rebranding, and a ton of trouble making an entirely new brand. With a web app, you can buy up a domain name and get started easily.

After an afternoon of brainstorming (and some completely ridiculous ideas) we bought http://www.presskitn.com.  It’s a name that communicates the theme of our product– a veritable online press kit and newsroom– while also giving us a mascot. A cute mascot.

Note that, while we were aiming for a more feminine product, it didn’t involve any pinks, purples, flowers, or anything of that sort. Presskit’n, on the whole, ended up being very close to gender-neutral, except perhaps for the tough guys who just can’t handle the kitten-sleeping-on-cloud imagery.

Here’s a brand comparison with theme words and color palettes:

brandcomparison

PROBLEM: A crappy logo

First, I should start off by stating the obvious: Your logo is not your brand. Branding encompasses much more than that, especially on the web. But your logo is still a big part of it.

Logos can end up crappy for a lot of reasons. In our case, the IvyLees name and logo seemed to apply more to a network than a tool. With our shift in focus to creating online newsrooms, the old way of presenting ourselves didn’t make much sense.

So in the end, the logo itself wasn’t bad, but it still sucked for what we used it for. We haven’t gotten rid of it, we’re just using it for our umbrella site now, the IvyLees Network, which will become important as we develop other tools.

So, remember, if someone says your logo sucks, don’t take offense. They might just mean it doesn’t fit. On the other hand… it might just suck.

HOW WE FIXED IT: A new, better logo

This is always an easy fix. Make a new logo and measure how it performs. That sentence always scares people, but it could be as simple as getting an opinion from a friend. Of course, if you do have the money for focus groups and multiple design avenues, those are a good route to go as well.

After creating the initial logo, we subjected it to numerous opinions. You can see a progression of a few iterations of the Presskit’n logo here (and yes, it really does look like that after I sketch in Photoshop):

logoiterations

And you can thank Greg for pointing out to me how a cat’s eyes look when they’re asleep.

PROBLEM: Doing too much with one brand

This one seems obvious in traditional business, but sometimes is lost with web companies (as any “web app vs. startup” thread will show). Procter & Gamble makes toothpaste, but you can’t go out and buy a tube of “Procter & Gamble toothpaste.” You can buy Crest, though, which is made by them. If you’re doing a lot of different things,  it’s best to split them up for simplicity’s sake.

HOW WE FIXED IT: Breaking offerings into smaller, easier-to-swallow pieces

We were doing four things with IvyLees. We had the network, which let business and PR professionals get in touch with each other. We had a newsroom creator and news release builder, which let let businesses establish a free online presence. And then we also had a feature that let PR pros submit and talk about news releases, like a Digg or reddit for self-published business news.

After rotating the features through the focus of the front page, we concluded one thing: Nothing was gaining much traction. The reason for this was the mere presence of the other features; they were always there to clutter whatever had the focus. Inevitably, our testers would wander into the part of the site that they didn’t want to actually use.

This was our primary reason for breaking off our newsroom features and making Presskit’n.  You can see the immediate benefit by comparing screenshots:

screenshotcomp

As you can see, going simple, warm and inviting helped us out. It was a lot of work to rebrand (or really, to branch out our brand), but it paid off in the end.

AND FINALLY: Be brave.

You’ll feel anxious about rebranding if you have a lot invested into your brand. That’s a good thing. But whatever you do, don’t put off rebranding just because the timing doesn’t seem perfect. It never will.

Posted in Branding | 9 Comments

Keeping Private Information Secure with SSL Certificates

With more and more things going wireless, security can be an issue. In a wired network you would probably notice someone trying to plug into your cable modem, but with free public wifi becoming ubiquitous, it’s easy to forget that the information you are submitting might be in plain text. And with really private information it’s always better to have that extra layer of security even at home. Since we were about to set up upgrade plans on IvyLees, I got to work on encrypting data with SSL certificates.

Firefox Blue SSL

You can usually tell that a website is secure by looking for a lock image somewhere in the browser. If you use Firefox, the area behind the website icon in the address bar will turn blue or green. The image above is from Firefox 3.5beta. They’ve added the domain name to the blue backgrounds.

There are many places that you can get an SSL certificate these days and they will work with 99% of internet browsing devices. GoDaddy, Comodo, GEO Trust, VeriSign, and Thawte being the big providers that come to mind. I spent a day researching all of the different sources to find out what would be the best value for the price. I started by looking at sites that I use frequently to see what certificate they went with and I discovered that there isn’t a big winner that everyone goes with.

With a little more research I found WhichSSL. It has a chart comparison of many of the available certificates.

Later, I found that NameCheap was giving away free SSL certificates with a domain purchase or transfer. Since I had a domain that needed to be renewed, I transferred it over so that I could try it out. NameCheap is a reseller of a few different brands of certificates and the free one was a positive ssl from comodo.

You can now go to https://ivylees.com and know that all information being transferred is secure.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Welcome to Fedorable, a blog for technology and PR. It's updated by Rex Riepe and Greg Allard, the guys behind IvyLees.